Also I can't change the initial size value. To avoid any future interruption on the transaction's which are happening on daily basis, I need to shrink the file which will be relatively very small when done using the SQL Please provide solution. Use YourDatabase GO DBCC sqlperf(logspace) -- Get a "before" snapshot GO BACKUP LOG BSDIV12Update WITH TRUNCATE_ONLY; -- Truncate the log file, don't keep a backup GO DBCC SHRINKFILE(YourDataBaseFileName_log, 2); -- Now weblink
DBCC SHRINKFILE (Transact-SQL) Other Versions SQL Server 2012 Updated: August 1, 2016THIS TOPIC APPLIES TO:SQL Server (starting with 2008)Azure SQL DatabaseAzure SQL Data Warehouse Parallel Data Warehouse Shrinks the size of Is it mandate to take a transaction log backup apart from weekly full backup to keep my transaction log in control.2. However clicking OK won't remove the free space. ii) While this process is ongoing will there be any transaction mismatch/lost or affect anything from user side. http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/41215/shrinking-the-log-file-does-not-reduce-size
Please note that I've always done this via Enterprise Manager/SQL Server Management Studio, but it seems that when you shrink/truncate the log file, the physical size of the log file will So i've done a transaction log backup, and now when i do "DBCC SQLPERF ( LOGSPACE )" it says that 99% of my log file is empty space which is great: For more information about how to change the current database, see USE (Transact-SQL).DBCC SHRINKFILE operations can be stopped at any point in the process, and any completed work is retained.When a Which security measures make sense for a static web site?
sql-server share|improve this question asked Dec 14 '09 at 4:10 Chris 2362615 migrated from superuser.com Dec 14 '09 at 6:05 This question came from our site for computer enthusiasts and power share|improve this answer answered Dec 14 '09 at 5:22 EMP 1,42762632 add a comment| up vote 0 down vote I do have have a procedure in my site that does just To remove the replication from the database, sp_removedbreplication can be used. Log Reuse Wait Desc Log_backup Wednesday, October 10, 2012 2:22 PM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote dbcc loginfo reports 385 entries, all (except one) have the status 0. (That means they are committed,
I looked through DB Properties but did not see it. Sql Server Shrink Log File Not Working NOTE: I tried this and ran into the message 'cannot shrink log file because the logical log file located at the end of the file is in use.' I had to GO DBCC sqlperf(logspace) -- Get an "after" snapshot GO Update: Simon notes that he is getting an error on the BACKUP command. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7193445/dbcc-shrinkfile-on-log-file-not-reducing-size-even-after-backup-log-to-disk The recovery model is set to FULL.
Something seems busted on this DB, and I just dunno what it is. :( –Jordan Hudson Apr 22 '09 at 20:53 add a comment| up vote 0 down vote Try creating Sp_removedbreplication Contention on system tables can cause delays due to blocking.TroubleshootingThis section describes how to diagnose and correct issues that can occur when running the DBCC SHRINKFILE command.The File Does Not ShrinkIf To remedy this situation, you had to enter some dummy transactions after truncating the log to force the active part of the log to move around to the beginning of the What does this joke between Dean Martin and Frank Sinatra mean?
Should I report it? DBCC SHRINKFILE (AdventureWorks_Log, 1); GO -- Reset the database recovery model. Cannot Shrink Log File Because Of Minimum Log Space Required According to "SQL Server Intenals", " (in 7.0) ... Because The Logical Log File Located At The End Of The File Is In Use. No, separate backup for transaction log backups has been schedule. 2.
Any further transaction log backups are useless.You're writing to the transaction log file as transactions are submitted to the database. have a peek at these guys You can execute the following command to unmark the transaction as replicated EXEC sp_repldone @xactid = NULL, @xact_segno = NULL, @numtrans = 0, @time = 0, @reset = 1 At this The data file is shrunk only to the last allocated extent.target_size is ignored if specified with TRUNCATEONLY.The TRUNCATEONLY option does not move information in the log, but does remove inactive VLFs Both seems to be locked at 6 GB for some reason. Log_reuse_wait_desc Log_backup
EXEC sp_addumpdevice 'disk', 'ByBoxLog', N'C:\
share|improve this answer edited Dec 15 '09 at 20:05 answered Dec 14 '09 at 13:27 SuperCoolMoss 1,0121016 +1 worked Thanks! –Booji Boy Apr 25 '11 at 20:22 Dbcc Shrinkfile Example Share save files between computers "Mobile homes" in American and British English Simple geometry. Just wanting to clarify to see if I'm missing something in your answer. –pettys May 13 '15 at 15:39 2 UPDATE: my problem was that a paused replication/mirroring setup was
Does boiling tap water make it potable? share|improve this answer answered Jan 2 '14 at 14:16 SQL King 1 I think you are doing something wrong. Thx. –Ed.S. Dbcc Shrinkfile Not Working Also, why shrink it if it's just going to grow back out?
Then you are taking a backup with NO_LOG (removed from SQL Server 2012) . ALTER DATABASE AdventureWorks2012 SET RECOVERY FULL; GO C. share|improve this answer edited Aug 31 '15 at 9:18 dezso 14.5k73663 answered Aug 31 '15 at 8:16 mecool 1 3 This is terrible advice, never delete your transaction log, all this content Later version should do that for you.
If any of the log file is grown above 80%, then it should shrink. For example, if 7 MB of a 10-MB data file is used, a DBCC SHRINKFILE statement with a target_size of 6 shrinks the file to only 7 MB, not 6 MB.EMPTYFILE share|improve this answer answered Mar 15 '09 at 3:34 HardCode 4,36122047 There is nothing wrong with SQL Server's handling of log files. To get around this do another transaction log backup, and immediately run these commands, supplying the file_id found above, and the size you would like your log file to be reduced
Join Now Hello, We had these DBs on a SQL Server 2005, and we had to be manually monitoring log sizes because neither our backup software nor a manual backup from What is the problem here? Kind Regards, Thomas JohnReply « Older CommentsLeave a Reply Cancel reply Pinal Dave is a technology enthusiast and an independent consultant. share|improve this answer answered Mar 15 '09 at 3:26 Mitch Wheat 217k28347445 Thanks, but I get "No active open transactions.".
share|improve this answer edited Feb 13 at 10:39 Peter Mortensen 10.4k1370108 answered Aug 21 '12 at 1:42 CGK 411 this worked perfectly for me. More frequently if the server is busy. Therefore, we strongly recommend that you back up the log immediately before switching, which allows you to recover the database up to that point. Replication has never been used on this DB or this server was toyed with once upon a time on this db.
Explained here 0 Thai Pepper OP Robert L Davis Mar 28, 2014 at 5:05 UTC Adam Rush wrote: Beat me to it Rob! Time to time I stop to think myself what is your motivation to write and share your experiences with all of us. But what I have really noticed is when I truncate or purge the logs, my app's performance increase dramatically, that is the reason why I truncate every 30min.What I need is: I have scheduled a weekly full backup.
This documentation is archived and is not being maintained.