share|improve this answer answered Dec 8 '11 at 22:52 mrdenny 24.4k22765 2 You can find the exact reason for the log not reusing space with SELECT name, log_reuse_wait_desc FROM sys.databases I changed it back to FULL after freeing the disk space. –neoscribe Oct 31 '12 at 0:23 I'm gonna kiss your chicks if you don't mind :) –mhesabi Sep This is not the ideal way to handle this situation, but if things are blowing up and you have no choice, this will do the trick. When using SQL Server Management Studio, after doing a full database backup followed by a full transaction log backup, the shrink files page shows plenty of free space available, but it weblink
As mentioned, you'll probably see LOG_BACKUP, but it's good to be sure there isn't anything else going on in the situation that will complicate matters. Thank You, Paul sql-server-2008 shrink truncate transaction-log share|improve this question asked Dec 8 '11 at 22:00 Paul Hinett 1113 marked as duplicate by Jack Douglas♦ Dec 11 '12 at 16:17 This If no target size is specified, a shrink-file operation removes only the inactive virtual log files beyond the last active virtual log file in the file. Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up SQL Server 2008 log will not truncate up vote 20 down vote favorite 14 I consider myself a very experienced SQL person.
use DBNAME SELECT name ,size/128.0 - CAST(FILEPROPERTY(name, 'SpaceUsed') AS int)/128.0 AS AvailableSpaceInMB FROM sys.database_files; i recommend reading the following http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms189493.aspx Remarks section and also read about (Shrinking the Transaction Log) http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms178037(SQL.105).aspx Does the database have mirroring or replication configured? I'll have to try this in the next day or so and post back with results and what I found. If you are using a db with a log which can grow to 300GB fairly quickly then you will want to leave it much larger, and set the "Shrink file to:"
In order to grow the log file back out, it has to freeze all activity hitting the log file and lock the file. It is recommended that you set the "Maximum free space in files after shrinking" to at least 10% on the Shrink Database screen for performance reasons. Virtual log files have no fixed size, and there is no fixed number of virtual log files for a physical log file. Sql Server Shrink Log File Best Practice I tried to view the LOG file to see what went rogue and blew it up - but the log file was a bunch of nonsense to me. 0
there's no worries if you're in a development/QA environment. Creating your account only takes a few minutes. Then I go back and delete the multiple backups I have created. plz give me [email protected]@Reply Prathamesh Deshpande December 10, 2014 1:24 pmHi Pinal,I want to monitor log files of all DBs.
If the database is in FULL or BULK_LOGGED recovery and you see a lot of zeros, but a 2 on the last one, you may have to wait for some transactions Mssql Shrink Log File PDF Downloads SQL Coding Standards SQL FAQ DownloadDownload SQL SERVER 2016 (FREE)Exclusive Newsletter SQL Interview Q & ASearch © 2016 All rights reserved. share|improve this answer answered Jan 17 '13 at 16:45 Remy 1 add a comment| Not the answer you're looking for? Be aware that if you switch to the full recovery model during a bulk operation, the logging of the bulk operation changes from minimal logging to full logging, and vice versa.
But this is only a workaround. http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/8965/sql-server-2008-log-file-out-of-control-cant-shrink-it If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question. Sql Server Shrink Log File Not Working Backup and voila, a perfect 0% log. Because The Logical Log File Located At The End Of The File Is In Use. Rant To Microsoft: So, please correct me if I'm wrong, if I fail to do the t-log backup BEFORE changing from FULL to SIMPLE and lo and behold my database gets
Please remember to click Mark as Answerand Vote as Helpfulon posts that help you. http://philgiebler.com/log-file/sql-2008-shrink-log-not-working.html Yes No Do you like the page design? Whew! Expand the "Databases" Folder, right click on the database, select properties. Log_reuse_wait_desc Log_backup
You vote me down without proving I'm wrong? If you have a transaction that never closes, you cannot ever shrink the log. I'm losing track of the flow of my PHP web app, it's becoming hard to work with How to return signed distance from DistanceMatrix? check over here I am able to successfully move all the logs from SQL Server to some other server.
You MUST take transaction log backups to keep LDF size under control. For an alternate way of doing it please see this article. also as suggested earlier: Pls. Shrink Sql Log File 2012 To avoid any future interruption on the transaction's which are happening on daily basis, I need to shrink the file which will be relatively very small when done using the SQL
No matter what I try, the log remains at 1964.25MB, with 30% used, which is still growing. Utensil that forms meat into cylinders concatenate lines based on first char of next line Texas, USA speed ticket as a European citizen, already left the country Which security measures make As mentioned, you'll probably see LOG_BACKUP, but it's good to be sure there isn't anything else going on in the situation that will complicate matters. this content How to check whether a partition is mounted by UUID?
The file is shrunk either to the size at which only 25 percent of the file is unused space or to the original size of the file, whichever is larger. What game is this? If these options still do not work, then you will have to use a less safe method like backing up the database to a file and restoring it over the existing Make sure "Release unused space" radio button is selected and press the "OK" button.
The log file now looks similar to this:The DBCC SHRINKFILE statement also issues an informational message that states that it could not free all the space requested, and that you can ALTER DATABASE AdventureWorks SET RECOVERY FULL; GO share|improve this answer edited Feb 13 at 10:25 Peter Mortensen 10.4k1370108 answered Apr 1 '09 at 14:37 Quentin THIS is the much dont shrink your log file, if you take regular t-log backups chances are your workload needs this much t-log size, shrinking wont help you much rather give you a dent in However, it has always involved doing a full backup of the data file.
Manage Your Profile | Site Feedback Site Feedback x Tell us about your experience... Shrinking the log is not a permanent fix if the log is just going to grow again. –Shawn Melton Jun 4 '12 at 4:59 Shawn [email protected] Actually this DB And now for one more sobering thought for all you production DBAs thinking about using the script: BEFORE YOU CHANGE THE RECOVERY MODEL FROM FULL TO SIMPLE... Navigation in insert mode String.valueOf strange behaviour Share save files between computers I'm technical referent but I lost the lead for technical decisions What Russian letter is this?
The message tells you what actions you have to perform to remove the logical log from the virtual logs at the end of the file. This breaks the chain of the logs and in future you will not be able to restore point in time. Related 5How to reduce the log file size without shrinking it in SQL server15How does shrinking a SQL Server log file affect performance?7Will the transaction log shrink automagically in SQL Server?2Does share|improve this answer edited Aug 31 '15 at 9:18 dezso 14.5k73663 answered Aug 31 '15 at 8:16 mecool 1 3 This is terrible advice, never delete your transaction log, all
I think I may have to resign myself to the fact there could well be a bug in SQL Server 2008, or that my log file has been corrupted in some Check and see if you have replication running on this database. Most times there are problems, the database has not had a proper maintenance plan created and scheduled. –Mitch Wheat Mar 15 '09 at 3:37 Bollocks. After switching, you need to take periodic data backups to protect your data and to truncate the inactive portion of the transaction log.
Does Apex have an equivalent to the C# object initializer?