The link to the fix is here: FIX: When you query through a view that uses the ORDER BY clause in SQL Server 2008, the result is still returned in random Why is ORDER BY without TOP a limitation? The code to create the view is CREATE View [dbo].[TopUsersTest] as select u.[DisplayName] , sum(a.AnswerMark) as Marks From Users_Questions us inner join [dbo].[Users] u on u.[UserID] = us.[UserID] inner join [dbo].[Answers] am i doing something wrong.Revision date:12/10/200908/12/2010Thank you very much for the helpful info. his comment is here
we have to omit TOP keyword from Views. As far as I know (entirely possible I'm wrong), my options are views or user-defined functions that return tables. yet another reason not ot use views. Username: Password: Save Password Forgot your Password?
share|improve this answer answered Aug 1 '13 at 10:24 hendra1 306311 Ugh, why has this not been integrated into SQL Server 2012 yet!? –BlueRaja - Danny Pflughoeft Dec 16 SearchWindowsServer Windows Server 2016 networking features bolster control, security Windows Server 2016 boasts improved load balancing and new ways to protect the data center from DoS attacks. In order to solve his businss problem, the solution is: CREATE VIEW vwRouteReference AS select * from ( SELECT tblItem.ID, tblItem.Numb + ' - ' + tblQuestion.DescrPrimary AS FullName, tblItem.Numb, tblQuestion.DescrPrimary It is returning...a table!
My vote is to remove them as the best practice is not to do formatting in SQL.Tara KizerMicrosoft MVP for Windows Server System - SQL Serverhttp://weblogs.sqlteam.com/tarad/Subscribe to my blog Kristen Test Cheers Serge -- Serge Rielau DB2 Solutions Development DB2 UDB for Linux, Unix, Windows IBM Toronto Lab Feb 4 '06 #37 P: n/a Doug >let's say you have a rather complex Login or Sign Up to become a member! Top 100 Percent In Sql Server I would suggest if you wish to order a view why don't you just do this.
Thanks Jeremiah for some more inputs.Thanks, SureshReply Jon Russell August 30, 2010 11:53 pmGood and useful post.My understaning of the use of ORDER BY in views was only to make the Cheers Serge -- Serge Rielau DB2 Solutions Development DB2 UDB for Linux, Unix, Windows IBM Toronto Lab Jan 26 '06 #10 P: n/a Doug >Someone was asleep in their RDBMS class! A proc, returning a table, should not preserve order. read this article Alberto, are you sure you are not talking about Indexed Views here?
Copy USE AdventureWorks2012; GO SELECT name, SCHEMA_NAME(schema_id) AS SchemaName FROM sys.objects WHERE type = 'U' ORDER BY SchemaName; D. Sql Server Order By Not Working The content you requested has been removed. Thanks for the reference. Why do you associate not using views with cursors?
Log in :: Register :: Not logged in Home Tags Articles Editorials Stairways Forums Scripts Videos Blogs QotD Books Ask SSC SQL Jobs Training Authors About us Contact us http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/21434/why-does-order-by-not-belong-in-a-view You will not notice that there is no SORT operation at all.I have heard many people talking about workaround, where they use some other number less than 100 in the TOP Order By In View Sql Server The order in which rows are returned in a result set are not guaranteed unless an ORDER BY clause is specified.Determine the order in which ranking function values are applied to Order By In View Oracle And if so, why is it okay to sort a table returned by a stored procedure?
My adopted daughter is going to die in her 30's because of incompetence in the foster care system. this content Now I know. PDF Downloads SQL Coding Standards SQL FAQ DownloadDownload SQL SERVER 2016 (FREE)Exclusive Newsletter SQL Interview Q & ASearch © 2016 All rights reserved. Everything I've read on the web suggests that including the TOP directive should enable ORDERY BY in views. Can We Use Order By Clause In View In Sql Server
Copy USE AdventureWorks2012; GO SELECT Name, Color, ListPrice FROM Production.Product WHERE Color = 'Red' -- ORDER BY cannot be specified here. You cannot edit your own posts. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed weblink For versions prior to 2005, the ordering done by the actual alias nameMadhivananFailing to plan is Planning to fail Kristen Test United Kingdom 22859 Posts Posted-08/19/2010: 11:08:25 I assumed
thanks. The Order By Clause Is Invalid In Views Options for sitemap generation on larger solutions R: regex for math expression Build me a brick road! It has no ordering by definition.
it DOES return an ordered data set. For more information about these transaction isolation levels, see SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL (Transact-SQL).The ORDER BY clause contains a column or combination of columns that are guaranteed to be unique.See the You cannot upload attachments. Why We Can't Use Order By Clause In View All of a sudden, these don't return ordered sets.
You cannot edit your own events. Nothing more. one more thing i would like to add is till the time i dont use INTO , i can see the desired result but as soon as i create new table check over here It worked!!!
Start my free, unlimited access. I had to laugh when I saw it sorted when I ran it in design mode, but not the saved view. hope to get reply from Mr. Doubtful SQL PIVOT helps merge results into a single row Load More View All Problem solve PRO+ Content Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.
You could never put ORDER BY in a view, without also including TOP. The plain fact is that SQL Server is a tool. State what version of SQL Server you are using and specify the content of any error messages.