Build me a brick road! It doesn't seem that hard to come up with situations where (at least to me / IMHO) it seems perfectly intuitive to have a sorted view. it doesn't hold data, it just holds the definition of the query. Downgrading to SQL 2008 will not help as the behavior is same in 2008 also. weblink
Step 2 of 2: You forgot to provide an Email Address. SQL 2008 R2 using . Shards of Oracle: Distributed performance improved in Oracle 12c Release 2 Database sharding appears in the newly available Oracle 12c Release 2. Few days ago i came across a strange problem with the Order By , While creating a new table i used Select - Into - From and Order By (column name) http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1306359/order-by-in-a-sql-server-2008-view
For example, you must tie several tables for accomplish just one result, if you query, and query and query each time this is poor programing technique, with VIEWS SQL automatically updates The link to the fix is here: FIX: When you query through a view that uses the ORDER BY clause in SQL Server 2008, the result is still returned in random the query. The bug was fixed in SQL 2005.I remember the day I upgraded and found developers doing this.
So we created a view to use with the limited access privileges that the katchangy has on our sql server. SELECT TOP(SELECT COUNT(SNO) From MyTable) * FROM bar WITH(NOLOCK) ORDER BY SNO share|improve this answer answered Mar 26 '15 at 10:52 Lakshminarayanan E 115 add a comment| up vote 0 down Should I be concerned about "security"? Top 100 Percent In Sql Server It only garentees that the correct records are in the TOP clause.I have only found this to actually work with a TOP [number], but not with a TOP PERCENT.
A better way of accomplishing this is first creating the view as: create view vw_orderdetails as select OrderId, ProductId, UnitPrice, Quantity FROM [order details] go Then write a select statement such Order By In View Sql Server 2008 It seems to say that applying the hotfix will guarantee that ORDER BY in views always works (which obviously contradicts the MSDN article (and possibly good sense!)) –Mitch Wheat Feb 13 Please provide a Corporate E-mail Address. http://blog.sqlauthority.com/2010/08/23/sql-server-order-by-does-not-work-limitation-of-the-views-part-1/ Did the Gang of Four thoroughly explore "Pattern Space"?
Strikethrough and Roman numeral analysis in Schoenberg Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. The Order By Clause Is Invalid In Views Read the article at http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/Best+Practices/61537/ for best practices on asking questions.Need to split a string? why its important and when its important ? This email address is already registered.
Magnetic effect on AC circuits? http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/66353/why-is-the-order-by-clause-in-a-view-ignored-as-soon-as-its-called-with-a-where It sounds like I might be wrong with my original comment. Order By In View Sql Server The code to create the view is CREATE View [dbo].[TopUsersTest] as select u.[DisplayName] , sum(a.AnswerMark) as Marks From Users_Questions us inner join [dbo].[Users] u on u.[UserID] = us.[UserID] inner join [dbo].[Answers] Order By In View Oracle You cannot post EmotIcons.
He has authored 11 SQL Server database books, 21 Pluralsight courses and have written over 3800 articles on the database technology on his blog at a http://blog.sqlauthority.com. have a peek at these guys In real life I don't support this and think WHERE clauses have a place in views, and in the same vein, so do ORDER BY clauses.Also, sometimes I have wanted users Thanks.Reply Nakul Vachhrajani August 24, 2010 7:41 pmLet me start out by thanking you for yet another good, useful and very practical article. ORDER BY should be used outside the View and not in the View. Can We Use Order By Clause In View In Sql Server
Cheers, Ryan share|improve this answer answered Aug 21 '12 at 23:51 Ryan Montgomery 211 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up I would say that "Views behave like base tables. Report Abuse. check over here Try TOP 2000000000 instead.
ORDER BY clauses applied to a view definition are ignored and I doubt this will change. Why We Can't Use Order By Clause In View First, I have been working with databases and SQL for over 25 years, going back to dBase. Try this procedure shown in this postReply Azhar Iqbal November 1, 2010 5:38 pmNice Explanation dear PinalReply Sandhya March 22, 2011 6:33 pmVery Good article.Thanks, PinalReply saggi March 31, 2011 1:56
E-Handbook Shining a light on SQL Server storage tactics Start the conversation 0comments Send me notifications when other members comment. The reason that using ORDER BY with TOP works at all is because the use of TOP forces SQL Server to perform a cursor operation over the result set. In SQL Server we generally don't talk about a row being a tuple because the physical implementation of a row is so obvious to us (the table lists the columns in Sql Server Order By Not Working This is actually not the case.
How can you assign an attribute of "bad" to an object by examining it the way you did? An excellent comparative demonstration of this inaccuracy, can be found here... Windows Server 2016 license shakeup affects enterprise choices Organizations mulling an upgrade to a Windows Server 2016 license should understand the big differences in features available ... this content Five SharePoint 2016 Feature Pack 1 updates to watch Feature Pack 1 for SharePoint 2016 makes running hybrid content management a bit easier with tools that work across SharePoint ...
Friday, May 25, 2012 12:46 PM Reply | Quote Moderator 3 Sign in to vote Hello, As per the design of the view, you can use ORDER BY only if you Using "top 100 percent" logically allows predicate pushing however the implementation unfortunately ignores "order by" for this case and defeats the intent.