Is there an update to SQL Server 2008 to resolve this issue? Therefor it can have an explicit order. –Tim Schmelter Jul 24 '12 at 20:46 @TimSchmelter that doesn't help when the optimizer sees TOP 100 PERCENT / ORDER BY and Marked as answer by Stephanie Lv Tuesday, September 06, 2011 8:31 AM Wednesday, August 31, 2011 2:58 AM Reply | Quote Moderator 0 Sign in to vote On SQL Server 2008 It suggests that if we use ORDER BY with TOP, we can surely use ORDER BY. weblink
Sign in for existing members Continue Reading This Article Enjoy this article as well as all of our content, including E-Guides, news, tips and more. Using "top 100 percent" logically allows predicate pushing however the implementation unfortunately ignores "order by" for this case and defeats the intent. In this particular case, the optimizer recognizes that TOP 100 PERCENT qualifies all rows and does not need to be computed at all. Along with 14+ years of hands on experience he holds a Masters of Science degree and a number of database certifications. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15187676/create-a-view-with-order-by-clause
The Best SQL Server Web Links: tips, tutorials, scripts, and more. You don't need an optimizerif that were thecase, as you aren't askingdeclarative questions anymore. close Connect With Us TwitterFacebookGoogle+LinkedInRSS IT/Dev Connections Store SQL Server 2016 SQL Server 2014 SQL Server 2012 SQL Server 2008 AdministrationBackup and Recovery Cloud High Availability Performance Tuning PowerShell Security Storage Why didn't "spiel" get spelled with an "sh"?
Browse other questions tagged sql-server sql-server-2008-r2 view order-by or ask your own question. Strange that they added the Sort Type and Sort Order columns to the designer while they actually should not be used... Put the ORDER BY on the query that references the view. –Aaron Bertrand♦ Jun 2 '14 at 1:04 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 7 down The Order By Clause Is Invalid In Views Microsoft re-open the loop hole - thankfully!
The basic idea is like this (simplified): SELECT [EventType].Name, [EventType].TotalOccurrences, [Session].ID, [Session].TotalOccurrences, [Session].TotalOccurrences / [EventType].TotalOccurrences AS saturation FROM [EventType] INNER JOIN [Session] ON [EventType].ID = [Session].Event ORDER BY saturation This view How to replace 8-sided dice with other dice Texas, USA speed ticket as a European citizen, already left the country Bringing whale meat in to the EU Check file content looking How to replace 8-sided dice with other dice Does boiling tap water make it potable? If I've followed the history correctly, this was once possible and was explicitly removed from SQL Server 2008 and so on (don't quote me on the exact version).
And that means they won't want to upgrade at all. Sql Server Order By Not Working It gets removed from the query plan, and there is no other reason to do an intermediate sorting operation. From the Blogs Sep 15, 2016 Sponsored Power BI Desktop “Publish to Pyramid Server” Button Many organizations today cannot use public cloud solutions because of security concerns, administrative challenges and functional One exception to the new rule of "no ORDER BY in a view" is when the new TOP function is used in the view also.
Ask your technical SQL Server questions--or help out your peers by answering them--in our live discussion forums. Best Regards Alex Feng | Forum Support Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. Order By In View Sql Server 2008 Whether the push should happen before the order by is really a developer choice and can change the answer. Can We Use Order By Clause In View In Sql Server Windows Server 2016 license shakeup affects enterprise choices Organizations mulling an upgrade to a Windows Server 2016 license should understand the big differences in features available ...
SearchContentManagement Microsoft Teams takes aim at Slack Microsoft's new collaboration tool makes sense for Office 365 customers, but it would be a tough sell for companies using a ... have a peek at these guys Not that that is a problem, but I'm wondering if anything exists to tackle that without the latency overhead of multiple round-trips to the database? [Edit] The above sample was over-simplified, Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the whn i was givin d query in sql to make view thn i m getting error tht order by nt valid n cant b use wid view…..Reply neelesh kumar October 30, Top 100 Percent In Sql Server
The plot thickens...Yes, the error will not appear and the view will be created. If we want all the rows of the table, we can use TOP with 100 PERCENT. Or because the performance is bad (according to you)? check over here I get the part where TOP 100 was ignored.
asked 2 years ago viewed 3739 times active 2 years ago Blog How We Make Money at Stack Overflow: 2016 Edition Stack Overflow Podcast #94 - We Don't Care If Bret Why We Can't Use Order By Clause In View Select [Columns] From [YourView] Order By [Columns] –Zane Jul 25 '12 at 18:34 add a comment| 7 Answers 7 active oldest votes up vote 28 down vote accepted (Indexed views aside, writes: "First, creating a view from the GUI will automatically add in the Top 100 Percent clause if there is an Order By clause.
This email address doesn’t appear to be valid. well, seems it's not fixed. Some customers complained about this so loudly that Microsoft issued a trace flag to reinstate the old behavior. Sql Server View Order By Top 100 Percent And that would be a shame.LaterBrianRecent postsScale BreaksToo much EnterpriseStorage Crisis?
Views are tables." –ypercubeᵀᴹ Jul 31 '12 at 0:49 add a comment| up vote 1 down vote ANSI SQL only allows the ORDER BY on the outermost query for a variety E-Handbook Shining a light on SQL Server storage tactics Start the conversation 0comments Send me notifications when other members comment. If you want rows to be returned to the user in sorted order, you need to use an ORDER BY on the outermost query block (per ANSI) to guarantee the output this content This is exposed via ORDER BY, and this is really only legal in the ANSI spec on the outer-most query block of a query.
Let us try to modify our view with the usage of TOP 100 PERCENT and ORDER BY. Regards, Alberto Morillo SQLCoffee.com Tuesday, August 30, 2011 6:06 PM Reply | Quote Moderator 0 Sign in to vote Hi, I just tested on an SQL Server 2008 R2 instance, and